外贸社区
罗翔
美国论瓦良格
  not drinkin the Koolaid about a minute ago

    WW3 here we go

 

    第三次世界大战,开始

    Hook 21 minutes ago

    We should have made and sold them a good new one. That would have narrowed the trade gap and put Americans to work. No we haved to pay millions to a foreign company to scrap a billion dollar ship that was never finished Thanks uncle Sam

 

    我们应该制造出一艘好点的新点的卖给他们。这就可以缩小贸易差额,美国人就有工作了。不,我们得花数百万美元给一家外国公司,来解体一艘十亿美元的未完工的航母。感谢山姆大叔。

 

    Da Coronel 29 minutes ago

    We paid

    China the $$ so they could buy it from the Trustworthy Russians. Now they "only" want to use it for "Training and Research".... riiigghtt! Sure, uh huh, I believe them.

 

    我们给中国钱,他们拿着钱从值得信赖的俄国人那里买了这航母。现在,他们“只是”想用它来“训练和研究”…对!!!当然,嗯哈啊,我相信他们说的话。

 

     廉价的中国垃圾,应该一年内就会沉掉!!!!!

 

    Gil 5 minutes ago

    Game on!!!

 

    好戏上场!!!(游戏开始了!!!)

 

    ROK 10 minutes ago

    Japan just started out like this and we remember what happened right? Japan expanded and took over half of asia and the only way they were stopped from expanding into all of asia was war

 

    日本当年就是这样开始的,我们还记得当时的情况对吧?日本扩张,占领了一大半亚洲,阻止他们占领整个亚洲的唯一方法就是战争

 

    DNA 14 minutes ago

    Nations fight wars, not armies.... A strong government, socio-economic system, economy are as important as a strong millitary. This was the reason that helped the

 

    US and NATO beat USSR. The military never fought with each other, yet the USSR came losing because of the lack of the above mentioned. In the case of China vs. the USA, the US is more like the 60s/70s USSR and China more like the post 2nd world war US. But China has the biggest upper hand in being America's biggest creditor. They can win only by calling the debt... The military is just a tool in the larger spectrum....

 

    国 家战争,不是军队的战争…一个强大的政府,社会经济制度,经济跟军事一样重要。这就是美国和北约打败苏联的原因。军队从来没有参与战争,但苏联倒了,因为 缺乏上述所说的因素。现在中美这个情况,美国就像是六七十年代的苏联,而中国就像是二战后的美国。但中国是美国的最大债权人,占有最大的优势。他们只要叫 你还债就能赢了…在一个大局中,军事只是其中的一个工具。

写评论